Football - Chuck Klosterman ---------------- 4 Stars

I've read and reviewed a couple of Chuck Klosterman's books (reviews here) and have always found them quite entertaining and unique. He has a writing style that is really his own and a fascinating way of taking mundane things or topical issues and putting a philosophical spin on them. That is the same with his recent release, Football. I found it an engaging read with some deep thinking and really novel ways to reflect about the incredibly popular past time that is modern day American football. 

This book only came out a couple months ago and I was lucky enough to borrow a copy from the library and I'm pretty happy I did. Like this other books I've read, I always find myself thinking far more deeply about whatever subject I'm reading about with a Klosterman book. This was no exception as he made me really consider why football is so popular, when/how long might it continue to be popular, and other engaging ideas.

The book was pretty short and a fairly easily read. Of course, with Klosterman, I found myself realizing just how silly certain things are, especially with the ways he explains them, but also having to re-read sentences or paragraphs, either because of the elevated vocabulary used or confusing observations and viewpoints. Oddly, this book seemed a lot longer than it actually was. On the Kindle, I "finished" it while only 70% completed; the rest was Index with, what seemed, a reference and listing of page number to nearly every word in the book. Which reminds me that I also enjoyed just how funny this book was. I enjoy Klosterman's bizarre sense of humor, and it was fully on display in this book (one example, he's telling a story about something that happened to him in high school and wrote something like, "my friend was there, let's call him Tim, since that was his name").

Of course, even with all these positives, the book can drag on occasion or make a reference to something so obscure that I have to believe most people reading have no idea what he's talking about. The book, of course, is quite focused on football, and, again, really is quite philosophical at some points. While interesting, I am not sure if this book would actually be enjoyed by most passionate football fans. It's a bit ironic that I think the audience for this book is much more likely to be readers of Klosterman books than general people who like football. Perhaps you can check it out and see what you think about it?

The Minds of Billy Milligan: A True Story of Multiple Personality - Daniel Keyes ------------ 3.5 Stars

The Minds of Billy Milligan is not a new book. The book was released a year after I was born and described the life of Billy Milligan - the first person to be acquitted by the insanity defense due to multiple personality disorder. I'm not sure when I came across this book and realized I wanted to read. I do know that it was difficult to procure. While some/many books can be found as an electronic copy with Libby, nearly all others have a paper copy in the library. Unfortunately, I couldn't find a paper copy in the local library either! So, to eBay, where I found a quite old paperback copy. This was both great and awful. On a positive, finally got a copy; the negative - it was about 8 point font and had to pick up reading glasses for the first time in my life. After all that, I did enjoy the book.

As I mentioned above, this book is about Billy and his 24 (yes, 24!) different personalities. Of course, there is some dispute about whether each or any of these are real. Unfortunately, Billy and/or these other personalities committed some burglaries and rapes which put him on trail and in jail and brought his condition out to the public.

The book is interestingly partitioned. In three parts, it begins with the trail phase and eventual decision about his sentence to a mental hospital. Then, it spends the majority of the book, recounting Billy's childhood all the way through the personalties taken over and eventual crimes. The final focus of the book was about Billy's time after sentencing going between mental hospitals while both sides appealed his case.

While I found the book quite interesting, Billy's timeline in the book ended only a few years after he was sentenced (when the book was published). Knowing there was probably much more to his story (there was), I did a pretty deep dive on the rest of his life. There is an uneven and somewhat interesting 4 episode docuseries on Netflix about him (bizarre editing, only need to watch the last two episodes). 

What I've not explored in this review (because it's both complicated and controversial) is how incredible, sad, and bizarre Billy's case of multiple personality disorder (now classified as disassociate personality disorder) truly is. I mean, the guy had 24 different people supposedly living in his head; besides being hard enough to even keep track of that many, the way he seemed to truly change when each one of them took over the "spotlight" was like nothing else I ever read. 

It's hard to know if this particular book would appeal to the average reader. While incredibly fascinating, it's quite long and can be a slog. While hard to believe, it's also quite sad and evident who much trauma and abuse can really change a person. Perhaps check out an article or video about Billy and decide if you want to go much deeper before jumping in. 

The Secret of Secrets - Dan Brown --------------------- 4 Stars

Well, it's finally come to this, after 17 years and over 275 blog posts, the AI guest writer is here. Background - I had AI read all of my blog posts and then asked it to write the review for Dan Brown's recent release, The Secret of Secrets. Below is a fully AI/Gemini created blog post with every word computer generated.

A few observations:

1. Wow, this pretty dang good and quite similar to how I write. The structure is pretty similar to my blog posts, its conversational and direct (which I try to do), and fairly honest and opinionated (also me!).

2. Substantively, it covered a number of things I would have noted. Of course, the reference to The Da Vinci Code being such a great novel/cultural phenomenon. I totally agree with the strengths and weaknesses shared and felt the conclusion paragraph was almost exactly how I might have planned to end this blog post.

3. Mistakes/Misses - It's a bit too tongue in cheek. While I love that the AI referenced my earlier negative review for The Idiot, I'm not sure I'd call it out as a "slog" in this blog post. I also don't think I would have written the cringey, "The setup is classic Brown" but maybe I'm giving myself too much credit (likely the AI knows a lot more about what I've written than I do). I definitely did not Google anything to see if it was real, though maybe I should have if it thought I did. I don't think I would have choose the word "woke" when referencing religion and quantum mechanics (I think I've only mentioned work and one blog post though it was recently (UPDATE  - I just asked AI to check how many "woke" mentions in the blog and it said twice - September and December last year. I have no idea if that is right, but definitely don't wanna go back and read 300 blogs). Finally, this book was over 600 pages long; no idea where it got 400.

4. Finally, while it's been fun to observe, appreciate, and critique this AI generated post, it's unlikely I'll use AI to write these in the future. Truly, what would be the point of that? One of the main purposes of this blogs to continue maintaining and developing my writing skills and also sharing my love of recent books. If nothing else, it was an interesting experiment. 

Also, The Secret of Secrets is pretty entertaining read; you should check it out.

It has been a minute since I’ve picked up a Dan Brown novel. Like many of you, I blew through The Da Vinci Code years ago and found the Robert Langdon formula to be the ultimate "guilty pleasure" reading. When I saw his latest, The Secret of Secrets, pop up on my Libby app with no wait time, I figured it was time to see if the old dog had any new tricks.

The setup is classic Brown: a high-ranking official at the CERN laboratory is found dead in a room that shouldn't exist, clutching a coded cylinder. Enter our favorite symbologist, Robert Langdon, who has to sprint across Geneva to prevent a discovery that would—naturally—change the world as we know it.

The Strengths: If there is one thing Dan Brown knows how to do, it’s pacing. This book is a literal track meet. I found myself flying through chapters because they almost all end on a cliffhanger. It has that "just one more chapter before bed" quality that I really missed after slogs like The Idiot. Langdon remains a solid "thinking man's hero." I’ve always appreciated that he wins with his brain and a tweed jacket rather than a gun. Also, the historical tidbits about the early days of alchemy were actually pretty fascinating—I found myself Googling a few things to see if they were real (most were!).

The Negatives: Unfortunately, the "formula" is starting to show its age. If you’ve read more than two of these, you can almost set your watch by when the "shocking" betrayal is going to happen. There’s a female sidekick who is—stop me if you’ve heard this—the most brilliant person in her field but mostly exists to ask Langdon questions so he can explain things to the reader.

Also, the "science" in this one gets a bit... out there. There were stretches where I felt like the author was trying a bit too hard to be "woke" about the intersection of religion and quantum physics, and it felt a little pandering. It didn't quite have the stakes of his earlier work, and the "big reveal" at the end felt more like a 3-star payoff than a 5-star mind-blower.

Overall: Is it East of Eden? Not even close. But is it a fun, 400-page sprint that kept me engaged while I was on the treadmill? Absolutely. If you’re looking for something deep and life-changing, keep moving. But if you want a reliable page-turner that doesn't require a PhD to follow (even if it pretends to), it’s worth the time. It landed right in the middle for me—better than his last one, but not quite reaching the heights of the classics.

What We Can Now - Ian McEwan ----------------- 3.5 Stars

It's been over a decade since I last read and reviewed an Ian McEwan book (reviews here). As you can see, I thought Atonement was amazing but was disappointed with Enduring Love. But, McEwan just released What We Can Now, and it received strong ratings, so I thought I'd give it a shot. It ended up landing somewhere between the past two I reviewed.

While this book was no where was good as Atonement, I did find it quite interesting and a clever novel. While I found parts of it frustrating while reading it, it was one of those books that grew on more once I finished it. Always one to be adventurous, McEwan doesn't hold back from trying atypical form and unconventional styles. In this book, he jumps time often and never quite gives you enough information to make full meaning about what you are reading. Perhaps this is why the ending was so satisfying, and a bit of a saving grace.

For much of the novel, I found it a bit annoying and frustrating (a McEwan theme for me). Often the plot moved too slow and pages would go by with too much fluff. He's both a great writer and one that is hard to follow. Often not linear and concrete with describing actions, I do find myself having to pay a bit more attention than I do with other books. I wouldn't mind this as much if a break was given from time to time, but I find him often short on dialogue (which usually is much clearer) and heavy on convoluted prose. One other negative - I found most of the characters pretentious and hard to root for.

With that said, it's still a pretty engaging book. It starts off with a great opener and immediately draws you in as he takes his opportunity to jump into the future and share the dystopian landscape (I know, similar to so many other books at present). The novel then moves toward a bit of a Tenacious D focus (yeah, I bet not a lot of people make comparisons between Tenacious D and Ian McEwan). In this case, much of the novel centers around a poem read at a dinner party that is considered by many the greatest poem ever written. Similarly, Tenacious D has a hilarious song called Tribute (lyrics here). The joke of it is that there is a song that is well known of the greatest ever but can't be revealed or sang; I felt like it was the same bit here with this novel.

Overall, I think this book is worth the time. It's not a super long read and the ending is thought provoking. In fact, upon completion, I found much of the book thoughtful. Finishing it, you can't help but think about some important themes - how accurate are memories, how serious are the environmental challenges, what are the many forms of love, etc. If you can get past the time jumps and difficult writing style necessary for following important plot/character developments, the book is probably worth your time.